Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jennifer Ulrich's avatar

Enjoyed this review! Definitely curious about the book. I remember an article he wrote that had this kind of thinking behind it that I appreciated.

Expand full comment
Andrew Perlot's avatar

"The ability to last is so exceedingly rare that when a man finds something which has bested time, he has found a thing for which there is only one fitting adjective: divine.”

The divinity — or inherent goodness —of what's "lindy," isn't obvious, but it pairs well with another non-obvious idea beloved by the Stoics, Plato, and Renaissance thinkers that I believe is true: what is beautiful is good and vice versa. Beauty, then, is not subjective.

“If we cannot catch the Good with the aid of one idea, let us run it down with three: Beauty, Proportion, and Truth.” Plato said.

Plato and the Stoics believed beauty had an ethical dimension. If our character is virtuous, we are beautiful. A beautiful physical thing also has a sort of excellence, or goodness to it.

Which makes me wonder about the moral implications of building a civilization that doesn't aim for beauty by default. How many modern buildings are really beautiful? How much of our art even has the objective of being beautiful?

I think it's not coincidental that many ugly modern buildings — like big box stores and even glass skyscrapers — have a lifespan of 30-50 years. On the other hand, The Pantheon is still going strong after 1,898 years.

Works of art that stand the test of time, be they buildings or sculptures or great novels, elevate our soul on some level.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts